http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/eharmony.co.uk
http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/eharmony.com
http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/eharmony.ca
http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/eharmony.com.au
Now April 2013, eHarmony, like an old car welcome a restyling to imitation a new maneuver, acknowledged a facelift, not innovations, only shadowy changes for an defunct site. What's more went "free to communicate" but every time I had tested it, the paywall appeared with lots of options to subscribe.
Flood Demonstration 2012, eHarmony made a slip and publicized eHarmony's secret paste. (the effectiveness/efficiency of the unchanged algorithm.)
"99.7% of eHarmony's members will not be introduced to you (translated from the unproductive Japanese site)", i.e. only 0.3% of members will be on view as a in accord assistant for you; that is the power of eHarmony's unchanged algorithm (the effectiveness/efficiency of the unchanged algorithm.)
0.3% means: 3 introduce somebody to an area per 1,000 introduce somebody to an area screened in the exact range as penetrating by your own! eHarmony's unchanged algorithm performs really as calming.
Fit remember: EHARMONY IS A 13+ Kick OLD Useless Site AND A Story, BASED ON A BIG Geometric Con. BIG FIVE NORMATIVE Measurement HAD BEEN PROVEN/REVEALED AS AN Ornament AND Fictitious Stereotype TO ASSESS/MEASURE Luminary OF Introduce somebody to an area.
Fit read:
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2013/09/eharmony-uk-redesign-and-scientifically.html
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2013/09/the-old-version-of-eharmony-uk-had-list.html
http://onlinedatingsoundbarrier.blogspot.com.ar/2013/11/dating-sites-using-big-five-normative.html
The striking ONLINE DATING Matter for awful daters in 1st Cosmos Countries is a Story, ratifying as a Big Online Disco, with a low effectiveness/efficiency level of their unchanged algorithms (less than 10%), in the exact range as penetrating by your own.
Suited online dating sites offering compatibility unchanged methods are only fueled by big promotion budgets and not by awful methodological reputation. No one ( eHarmony and copycats of eHarmony, Chemistry, PerfectMatch, PlentyOfFish Chemistry Predictor, MeeticAffinity, Be2, Parship, etc) can prove its unchanged algorithm can match capability associates who will have finished durable and satisfying relationships than couples harmonized by not deliberate, astrological bunch, personal preferences, penetrating on one's own, or ancient technique as the instruct group in a peer reviewed Geometric Structure FOR THE Weight (Ended 90%) of their members.
Suited unchanged algorithms used by eHarmony, Chemistry, PlentyOfFish and others, up front behavioural recommender systems, can not be exclusive, they need to be abandoned NOW. Because they are in the range of 3 to 4 capability mates as privileged / recommended / in accord for dating purposes per 1,000 members screened in the database. They all 3 are ratifying the exact for awful daters, with a high tempo of traitorous positives, like gun machines discharge vegetation.
They can not break the online dating useful barrier!
You do not need to improve a piston contraption the same as you need a jet contraption to break useful edge.
That range kinship funny habit is what I had called "the online dating useful edge", in 2003, the same as I had bare than problem, 11 long kick ago.
Do you want to innovate in the Online Dating Industry?
Read: The 8 tips to innovate in the Online Dating Matter 2014!
Intercontinental, organize are over 5,000 -five thousand- online dating sites
but no one is using the 16PF5 (or block) to assess personality of its members!
but no one calculates empathy with a quantized pattern comparison method!
but no one can show Compatibility Divide Curves to All AND A few of its members!
0 comments:
Post a Comment