On Female Sympathy

A letter from that utmost gracious of women, Florence Nightengale:I store read partly your book thro', and am hugely perfect by it. But some kit I contrast with and foster I do not understand. This does not bring into play to the characters, but your conclusions, e.g. you say "women are foster gracious than men".Now if I were to put out a book out of my experience, I necessary begin Women store no attractiveness. Yours is the routine. Mine is the reliance of experience.Now look at my experience of men. A statesman, past humble age, gripped in politics for a section of a century, out of attractiveness with me, remodels his utter life and plan - learns a science the driest, the utmost ceremonial, the utmost fixed, that of charge, as far as it concerns the lives of men - not, as I learnt it, in the field from beginning experience, but by writing dry policy in a London room by my divan with me. This is what I call real attractiveness.Spanking (Alexander, whom I made Director-General) does very brutally the enormously clause. He is dead too. Clough, a writer untrained if ever dowry was one, takes to sensitivity charge in the enormously way, for me.I only shade three whose utter lives were remodeled by attractiveness for me. But I might shade very numerous others...I store never grow one woman who separate her life by one a little amount for me or my opinions.Now just look at the degree in which women store attractiveness - as far as my experience is vexed. And my experience of women is reasonably as large as Europe. And it is so interior too. I store lived and slept in the enormously bed with English Countesses and Prussian Bauerinnen. No [last woman] has ever had velocity of women of the identical creeds that I store had. No woman has joyful "passions" in the midst of women foster than I store. Yet I inspect no train behind me. My doctrines store under enemy control no tally in the midst of women...and I attribute this to a want of attractiveness.It makes me mad, the Women's Job talk about "the want of a field" for them - being I work out that I would gladly give lb500 a rendezvous for a Being Secretary. And two English Member of the aristocracy Superintendents store told me the enormously. And we can't get one... they don't work out the names of the Sideboard Ministers. They don't work out the offices at the Steed Guards...Now I'm positive I did not work out these kit. At the same time as I went to the Crimea I did not work out a Colonel from a Tangible. But dowry are such kit as Navy Lists and Almanacs. Yet I never might find a woman who, out of attractiveness, would deliberate one for my work.I do feel like I am "like a man," as Parthe says. But how? In having attractiveness.Women thirst for being loved, not for loving. They keen out at you for attractiveness all day long, they are toothless of bending any in comeback, for they cannot memorialize your associations long ample to do so...They cannot state a fact stringently to innovative, nor can that last accompany to it stringently ample for it to become information. Now is not all this the upshot of want of sympathy? I am unsettled with bile at what wives and mothers will do of the utmost egregious eccentricity. And people call it all maternal or conjugal inflammation, and think it somewhat to say so. No, no, let each person tell the reality from his own experience."Abundant, is it not, that the complaints of the feminists for "'the want of a division for them" in any case the fact that they store now claimed deep education, sensitivity, and school numbers, in the midst of others, for themselves.I work out the fit to Freud's revered question: "what do women want?" Patronizing.Nightengale's letter is explicitly exhilarating as its observations are very corresponding to persons of innovative woman who wrote a book on the subject, Dr. Helen, who observed in her modern interview with NRO: "I am confused how numerous women store no or little focal point for men."Alpha Raring to go 2011

Source: womanizer-psychology.blogspot.com